Comey serves the Obamacrat / Clintonista justice system

getpart-6It appears that Rev. Wright’s fondest dream has been realized…G-d has damned America! Like watching a train wreck . . .

  1. see the extensive record of blatant criminal behavior Cheryl Mills is guilty of but never touched by the justice system,
  2. the disgraceful conduct of James Comey and the utter shame the FBI has descended into under his “leadership,
  3. the certainty that this lawlessness will continue, even accelerate, with Democrats/liberals present in any branch of our government in any numbers

Paul Sperry writes at the New York Post  (excerpts)
Why did feds grant immunity to Hillary’s ‘highly improper’ aide? 

If anyone would know Hillary consigliere Cheryl Mills’ reputation for obstructing investigations, it’s FBI Director James Comey. He complained about her lack of cooperation while probing Clinton scandals in the 1990s. Yet he agreed to give Mills immunity from prosecution in his probe of Hillary’s illegal e-mails as secretary of state, where Mills was chief of staff. 

Perry goes on to specify Mills obstructionism protecting Hillary in the 1990’s. The assortment is extensive, the demeanor brazen, impudent, and defiant. The implications and the response of Republicans leadership  and “professionals’ like Comey were pathetic, undermining the rule of law.

Fast-forward to Hillary’s tenure as secretary. In October 2012, Mills sorted through key Benghazi documents and decided which to withhold from a review board. She also leaned on witnesses. Deputy ambassador to Libya Gregory Hicks testified before Congress in 2013 that Mills told him in an angry phone call to stop cooperating with investigators.

The FBI chief was fully aware of Mills’ M.O. when he launched his investigation. Yet even after discovering she was in the middle of everything improper, if not illegal, he treated her with kid gloves.

Comey knew it was Mills who had Hillary’s e-mails moved off her private unsecured server and onto laptops, where she decided which ones were government-related and OK for public release and which were “personal.” He knew it was Mills who shredded the e-mails that were printed out and who had the rest of the 31,000 e-mails deleted, and then had the laptops bleached clean.

And he knew it was Mills who told the Denver tech who maintained the server to stop retaining her e-mails and to delete Hillary’s archived e-mails, all of which the tech dutifully performed after Congress subpoenaed them and ordered them preserved.

Even so, Comey agreed to grant Mills immunity in exchange for her cooperation in the investigation. He also agreed to ground rules that left some lines of inquiry off-limits.

(snip)

Rather, it would be more productive to grill Comey under the klieg lights. Why did he give a key suspect who orchestrated the destruction of government records immunity as a witness? Why didn’t he demand prosecutors convene a grand jury to question Mills under oath? Was he pressured by the attorney general?

Sweating Mills could have cracked the case wide open. No one would have ever let H.R. Haldeman get away with editing the Nixon tapes. Why would the FBI director let Hillary’s chief of staff get away with deleting her e-mails?


DLH

This entry was posted in UNCATEGORIZED. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *