The ever so decorous Obama-Clinton foreign policy

Both are imbued with typical leftist / progressive moral indifference


Does anyone besides me tire of hearing politicians, “reporters”, political pundits, commentators on both sides, in any discussion regarding House Speaker Boehner’s invitation to Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address Congress, note that it was a “breach of protocol”. Everyone seems to agree, or at least are grotesquely anxious to be seen as agreeing, that it was just terribly disrespectful of our president  for the Speaker to invite Mr. Netanyahu without first seeking the approval of the White House.

“Everybody” agrees that Boehner committed a shockingly offensive misstep, and such strict champions of decorum, collegiality, respectful disagreement, and bi-partisanship as Susan Rice, Josh Earnest, John Kerry, the Congressional Black Caucus, et al, are seriously concerned that this could well damage the happy, cooperative, constructive relationship the White House has had with our closest ally in the Middle East.

As us hicks used to say down home, “What a crock!”

This is a White House and a president which has demonstrate over and over, that they have no respect for anyone or anything, be it political opponents, the Congress, traditional American values, the US armed forces, the Constitution, the courts, our allies everywhere in the world, and the dignity of the highest office in the land.

To recount specific examples of each requires a book, but any American who has anything more than a casual awareness of this president’s and his administration’s actions and words over the past 6 years, doesn’t require a recounting.

“A breach of protocol”?! Indeed! Are we not all “shocked”.

Why, one might think Speaker Boehner had taken “selfies” and spread them over the internet!


Foreign donation slipped Clinton vetting process

Yes, yes, that’s interesting, but did Hillary ever question Obama’s “Christianity”?

Note the term “slipped” in the headline. The culprit is the “ethics deal’…not enough “rigor”, ya understand’?

From Josh Gerstein at Politico

The Clinton Foundation failed to submit a $500,000 donation from the Algerian government to the State Department for approval under an ethics agreement put in place as Hillary Clinton was being confirmed as secretary of state, a foundation spokesman acknowledged Wednesday.

The charity’s failure to submit the 2010 donation for clearance by State Department ethics lawyers and to disclose that omission for more than five years seem likely to fuel questions about the rigor of the ethics deal that have arisen in recent weeks as Hillary Clinton readies an expected bid for the White House.

DLH


Just keep in mind these Obama -Clinton operating rules

  • One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.
  • One man’s invitation to a freedom fighter is an assault on another’s sense of decorum
  • Taking note of ethics in government in the face of a $500,000 donations is hard.
This entry was posted in UNCATEGORIZED, WAR & FOREIGN POLICY. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The ever so decorous Obama-Clinton foreign policy

  1. phil silverman says:

    now I think that’s darn cute: Clinton-Obama foreign policy. anything to compare to hoaxing us into a war resulting in 4,500 USA deaths & 120,000 civilian deaths? by the way, with no help from “Cheney Torture, Inc”, Obama engaged the Seals to nail BL, after W. & the CIA gave up in 2006. We got the 20 PCS and the 22 or more generals. We got Gadhafi without ONE DROP OF AMERICAN BLOOD spilled. Obama brought home Iraqi troops ahead of sched., thus alleviating the need for a 9th tour. sorry, little Bircherz.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *