Category Archives: JUDICIARY

Veritas Salad

“Net neutrality” — ever wonder what the term means and what the issues are in the controversy over “net neutrality.”   This article  by Marvin Ammori writing  at Wired explains.  The political gamesmanship involves a classic example of the use … Continue reading

Posted in ENERGY & CLIMATE, HEALTHCARE POLICY, JUDICIARY, UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Obama Molesting the Constitution – Republican Response?

The list below was compiled and presented by Kelly O’Connell in a column in the Canadian Free Press Obama’s Puerile Molestation of the Constitution is Gruesome & Exceptionally Dangerous. For “progressive” acquaintances  and liberal editorial boards, like the QC Times … Continue reading

Posted in JUDICIARY, MEDIA BIAS, REPUBLICAN VS DEMOCRAT | Leave a comment

The Dispatch & Argus, Striving For Zero Relevance

Shown herein are scans of the print versions of the January 23 and January 26 Dispatch – Argus, respectively. The partial scans are merely intended to demonstrate relative story emphasis, size and positioning, regarding observances marking the 40th anniversary of  … Continue reading

Posted in JUDICIARY, MEDIA BIAS, RELIGION AND GOVERNMENT | Leave a comment

Philosophizing Judicial Retention — First Just Say No

In our most recent post regarding the retention of Judge David Wiggins to the Iowa Supreme Court we hoped to make it clear that  Judge Wiggins by his ruling in the Varnum decision, which imposed legal recognition of homosexual marriage … Continue reading

Posted in JUDICIARY | Leave a comment

Solid Reasons To Vote No On Wiggins

Here are two links to web sites and articles that  provide key information as to why it is important to oppose the retention bid of Judge David Wiggins to the Iowa Supreme Court. Iowans for Freedom, a project of the … Continue reading

Posted in JUDICIARY | 1 Comment

Fire Justice Wiggins — Bus Tour Here Tuesday 9:30AM

  In 2010 Iowans turned over their ballots and voted to fire three Iowa Supreme Court Justices who were up for retention.  As their terms are staggered they were the only justices up at that time. Retention votes are “normally” … Continue reading

Posted in JUDICIARY | Leave a comment